Erast Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 22:12 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:49 +0100, "C. Bergström" wrote:
state? (Sorry, but I also find it rather ironic/funny that erast needs
to use SXCE to build nexenta core)
It is ironic. And I said it to you before - it is just luck of
interest/time of the community in making the procedure more clean. I
think nexenta-on source package is a first step in the right direction.
We soon should have it fully build-able out of "apt-get source -b".
This bounty is more principle than worth my time, but it is something I
can certainly help with. If you set everything up somewhere I may spend
a bit trying to help out.
On Hackathon day I'm going to work on nexenta-on build-related
documentation. Currently it is full of FIXME: statements. This should
help you to get started. Anil also could help you with SSH/DevZone setup
on gnusolaris.org if you don't have one yet.
FIXME? Oh. this sounds fun.. (Where on earth would you put those?)
Wrapper script around nightly? Makefiles? or c code that fails to
compile..? For what it's worth I think part of my progress could be
possibly ported to whatever build system you have... You'll have drop my
64bit enhancements, but otherwise it's quite clean and a script could
maybe convert it to any other sane build script format. It comes with
advantages/disadvantages, but fwiw.. the one time hit is more than worth
it to get away from the package maintainers mega onnv-gate build hell.
Let me know..
(As a side note... I'm working on a QA framework and new binary format,
but if there's some python bindings for manipulating deb files I could
probably hook up the whole thing to spit out debs directly)
./C
_______________________________________________
gnusol-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-users
