The discussion has been very inyeresting. At Vasco de Gama´s there were no 
Pacts, no International Law , no UNO.
We live in the 21st century. Should we allow "big fish to eat small fish" 
the same way USA did with Venezuela?
António Bernardo Colaço 
A quinta-feira, 8 de janeiro de 2026 à(s) 13:04:40 UTC, Edgar Valles 
escreveu:

> Concerning the accusation that "Many of the sailors who accompanied Gama 
> were CRIMINALS RELEASED FROM PRISON", this is not entirely true. Most of 
> the sailors were people from the interior of Portugal, who had never see 
> the sea and were not aware of the danger of the oceans. People who lived in 
> the littoral of Portugal were afraid of the sea and didn't want to go to 
> the ships (one third of the ships that went to India sank).Of course, there 
> were also criminals. as there were criminals in all armies.
> Concerning Angola, it is not true that "a group of far-left activists from 
> Portugal landed in Luanda and tried to overthrow the legitimate government 
> of Agostinho Neto". As Albert mentioned,the winners write History, not the 
> defeated.
> Angola is now one of the most corrupt regimes in the world. A very rich 
> country, where people live miserably. This began to happen soon after 
> independence. 
> A very large group of militants of the liberation movement tried to avoid 
> the path of corruption and keep the way to a real independence. 
> Agostinho Neto and his followers aniquilated this group and many angolan 
> innocents, murdering about 30 000 angolans...
> Edgar Valles
> Lisbon
>
>
> <[email protected]> escreveu (quarta, 7/01/2026 à(s) 15:12):
>
>> Talking about the wars in the Indian subcontinent, Kadamba, Yadava, etc., 
>> doesn't justify anything, because in Europe there were also wars between 
>> the Portuguese and Spanish, Germans and French, Napoleon and Hitler wanted 
>> to invade Russia and were defeated, etc., but these were wars between 
>> neighbors on the same continent. (Europe was responsible for both world 
>> wars).  
>>
>> What do Asians, Africans, native Brazilians, First Nations of Canada, the 
>> USA, Australia, and New Zealand think when Vasco, Albuquerque, Columbus, 
>> Pizarro, and Cortés are mentioned? That they were pirates who came from 
>> afar to steal, enslave, etc. Even today in Hungary and Poland, the Mongols 
>> of Genkis Khan are classified as savages who came to steal.
>>
>> The opinions of these people are WORTH MORE THAN the illusory grandeur of 
>> the invaders.
>>
>> The statues erected of them in the former colonies were torn down because 
>> they celebrated and represented the excruciating suffering of innocent 
>> people. These statues were transferred to museums so that future 
>> generations could learn about the past.
>>
>> Monuments honoring Josef Stalin disappeared from Eastern European 
>> countries after the fall of the Soviet Union. In 2003, US Army soldiers 
>> destroyed the statue of Saddam Hussein in Karbala after the invasion of 
>> Iraq. In the US, several monuments linked to slavery and colonialism, such 
>> as statues of Columbus, were targeted. In the United Kingdom, the statue of 
>> the trafficker Edward Colston was torn down. And in São Paulo, protesters 
>> set fire to a statue of the bandeirante Borba Gato - a fugitive from the 
>> law, gold smuggler, linked to the enslavement of Indians and blacks in 
>> Brazil and who played a prominent role in the expeditions into the 
>> Brazilian hinterland.
>>
>> Many of the sailors who accompanied Gama were CRIMINALS RELEASED FROM 
>> PRISON.
>>
>> Even after Angola's independence, for example, a group of far-left 
>> activists from Portugal landed in Luanda and tried to overthrow the 
>> legitimate government of Agostinho Neto. They were repelled and thrown into 
>> a mass grave. This is anti-colonial history.
>>
>> History is a science based on data, not on public opinion? History is 
>> based on the testimonies of the conquerors/victors, based on ideologies, 
>> racial supremacy, etc. It is not an exact science. Mathematics is 
>> considered an exact science. So, 2 plus 2 equals 4 and there's no arguing 
>> about it, and it's the same throughout the universe.
>> Alberto
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> ----- Mensagem de Edgar Valles <> ---------
>> Data: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 09:04:30 +0000
>> De: Edgar Valles <>
>> Assunto: Re: [GRN] Vasco da Gama
>> Para:
>>
>> Very good and deep explanation , about Portuguese role in Goa, the one 
>> made by John de Figueiredo. I  agree with it.
>> However, the last conclusion may arise controversy:
>> "The Portuguese only became foreigners in India on August 15, 1947, the 
>> day when the “tryst with Destiny” occurred (to use the famous expression of 
>> Jawaharlal Nehru).".
>> This would be true if Goa was integrated into British India. But it was 
>> not the case, Goa was a Portuguese colony and the independence of India 
>> didn't change its status. 
>> For example, Indonesia became independent in 1945 and Portugal ruled 
>> Timor Leste until Indonesia invaded it in 1975. Portuguese didn't become 
>> foreigners in Timor Leste in 1945, just because Indonesia became 
>> independent. 
>> By the way, as the people of Timor Leste didn't accept the invasion by 
>> Indonesia and fought, they were able to exercise the right of self 
>> determination in a referendum and on the 2th May 2002  independence was 
>> proclaimed. Indonesia , the invasor,was forced to give up Timor Leste.
>> According to the principles of Bandung Conference in 1955 and the United 
>> Nation rules,  people of a  colonial territory should be allowed to decide 
>> their own future. So, if Portuguese presence in Goa was legimitated till 
>> 1947, it didn't become illegitimate just because India became independent 
>> in 1947. 
>> It would be different if Goans expressed the decision to be part of India 
>> at that time. Then, Portuguese would be "foreigners in Goa" from that 
>> year...
>> My thoughts are not politically motivated, as the past belongs to the 
>> past. ..
>> Edgar Valles
>> Lisbon
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> JOHN DE FIGUEIREDO <[email protected]> escreveu (domingo, 4/01/2026 
>> à(s) 06:42):
>>
>>>      Let us not be elitist when judging Vasco da Gama. If he came from a 
>>> lower social class (meaning, I trust, that he came from a poor family with 
>>> a low educational level), then my admiration for him is even greater. 
>>> Clearly, he had to overcome a significant social disadvantage to master and 
>>> excel in the science and art of navigation and to convince his King that a 
>>> “commoner” like him was up to the extraordinary mission of commanding a 
>>> fleet from Portugal to India and back. And he did this, not once or twice, 
>>> but 5 times. He connected the dots and demonstrated how this could be 
>>> achieved. Was he helped by others? Sure. He was helped by the discovery of 
>>> Bartolomeu Dias that Africa had an end and by the Arab pilot who guided him 
>>> from East Africa to India. But so were Watson and Crick in their discovery 
>>> of the structure of DNA. They were helped by the previous discoveries of 
>>> Erwin Chargaff and Rosalind Franklin. This is how human knowledge advances, 
>>> step by step, one discovery leading to the next one. His important 
>>> achievement set the stage for an unprecedented globalization of knowledge. 
>>> Was he perfect? Far from it. Understanding something is not the same as 
>>> excusing it. What he did to the Muslim pilgrims is abominable by today’s 
>>> standards, but it was (as Frederick said) fair game in his time. In 1469, 
>>> Virupaksha I, Emperor of Vijayanagara, ordered the massacre of thousands of 
>>> Muslims in Bhatkal. The few who survived fled to (guess where) Goa, where 
>>> they found a home and thrived. Let us not be harsher in our judgment of 
>>> Vasco da Gama just because he was a European or he was from a “lower 
>>> class.” It really does not matter what Christians, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, 
>>> or Parsis think of Vasco da Gama. History is a science based on data, not 
>>> on public opinion. My point is that as Viceroy of India, his message to 
>>> fellow Europeans was: “If you are corrupt and steal from the public 
>>> treasury, I will punish you.” And that is exactly what he did, and this is 
>>> why we, Goans, should respect and admire Vasco da Gama as a person with 
>>> integrity. It was a risky decision. With the benefit of hindsight, we can 
>>> say that several of his successors as Governors or Viceroys (including our 
>>> own Barnardo Peres da Silva) were deposed by military coups when they 
>>> attempted to do what he did. A Secretary of State (European), who was, like 
>>> Gama, a person with integrity, was assassinated in plain daylight in front 
>>> of the Government Palace in Panjim by some fellow Europeans who saw him as 
>>> an obstacle to their schemes and scams. Imagine a scenario in which Vasco 
>>> da Gama looked the other way and may have even pocketed some money himself. 
>>> Today, we would correctly say that he was a thief and a party to a 
>>> cover-up. But that is not what he did. 
>>>
>>>
>>>      Why did the Portuguese occupy and settle in Goa? Good question. The 
>>> last time I heard this question was from my friend Luiz de Camoes. He had 
>>> Vasco da Gama being asked: “Quem te trouxe a estoutro mundo, tão longe da 
>>> tua Pátria Lusitana?” (“Who brought you to this other world, so far away 
>>> from your Lusitanian Motherland? "). This question raises all sorts of 
>>> other questions. What made the Kadambas infiltrate Goa after they were 
>>> defeated by the Chalukyas and conquer Goa, defeating its legitimate Goan 
>>> Kings? What made the Yadavas conquer Goa, terrorize the Goans, and impose 
>>> their language (Marathi) on the Goans? What made the Bahmanis and the Delhi 
>>> Muslims invade Goa and terrorize the Goans? What made Vijayanagara conquer 
>>> Goa? What forced Goa into the Sultanate of Bijapur? The only answer that 
>>> comes to my mind is what my teacher of History at the Liceu, Rev. Dr. 
>>> Antonio Garcia, S.J., used to say: “Just like in the big ocean the big fish 
>>> eat the small fish, so the stronger peoples invade and conquer the weaker 
>>> ones.” Happens even to this day, right under our noses. It seems to me that 
>>> the fundamental misconception in this conversation is to view the 
>>> Portuguese in Vasco da Gama’s time as foreigners. In fact, they were not 
>>> “more foreigners” or “less foreigners” in Gama’s time than the Kadambas, 
>>> the Yadavas, and all those other guys. The Portuguese only became 
>>> foreigners in India on August 15, 1947, the day when the “tryst with 
>>> Destiny” occurred (to use the famous expression of Jawaharlal Nehru). This 
>>> is why an agent of Vijayanagara approached Afonso de Albuquerque with the 
>>> assent of some Goans and asked him to free Goa from Bijapur.
>>> Sorry for this long note.  
>>> John M. de Figueiredo
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Goa-Research-Net" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/1112659100.3469483.1767508948056%40mail.yahoo.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/1112659100.3469483.1767508948056%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Goa-Research-Net" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to
>> [email protected]
>> .
>> To view this discussion, visit
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/CAEXcPuqXto0rsP4rc8-PuMTFt%2BWLpcPAe-L12TwP30-6wzAcew%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/CAEXcPuqXto0rsP4rc8-PuMTFt%2BWLpcPAe-L12TwP30-6wzAcew%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> ----- Fim da mensagem de Edgar Valles <> -----
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Goa-Research-Net" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/20260107102704.Horde.C1gNGNWJO6dDcdNk9WDbXmj%40mail.sapo.pt
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/20260107102704.Horde.C1gNGNWJO6dDcdNk9WDbXmj%40mail.sapo.pt?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Goa-Research-Net" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goa-research-net/4a7d27e3-ef84-4880-b84c-0b1deff6e133n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to