Santosh Helekar says: No reasonable person would regard it as common sense to question the motives of a professional scientist simply because his scientific findings are inconsistent with one's preconceived unscientific ideology. Most reasonable people would regard it as prejudice borne out of scientific ignorance and/or an ideological agenda.
Mario replies: As I have said before, this is the gullible school of environmentalism, which ignores all the contradictory evidence on global warming in order to make claims of the future based on phony readings of computer models. Garbage in garbage out. The environmental alarmist movement is dominated by researchers looking for grant money, and socialists who see this as their last hope of bringing western industry down to the lowest common denominator, which is why they exempt India and China from their suggested solutions. For a discussion by an environmental expert who provides an opposing view to that Santosh pushes visit the University of Virginia web site: www.evsc.virginia.edu/faculty/people/michaels.shtml Finally, Santosh says: 0.02% of carbon monoxide in the atmosphere can kill you in a few hours. Unfortunately, anyone who remembers basic chemistry would know that carbon monoxide cannot stay as carbon monoxide for "a few hours" in the atmosphere without turning into carbon dioxide.
