--- Peter D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I don't want to waste your time with personal trivia, >especially since your valuable work is subsidized by >the American taxpayer. >
Ah, the taxpayer card! Isn't it always better to waste time on partisan political trivia rather than on personal trivia generated by a dishonest excuse and a self-inflicted embarrassment? But I am really glad that you have suddenly discovered the value of taxpayer-supported secular scientific research, which is dependent on a proper understanding of evolutionary biology. > >The "us" referred to everyone on this list who read >your post and didn't want to make the same leap of >logic that you did. > Are you sure they share your leap of logic and your political agenda? > >Thanks for sharing the factual BASIS of your >assumptions, but what are your assumptions? > The facts I provided are my assumptions. What are yours, and those of the people you referred to as "us"? > >When you say "Indians", do you mean all, some, most, >many, a minority, majority...what? > What I mean is that in India anti-evolutionism, creationism, opposition to Big Bang cosmology, opposition to the established geological record and opposition to Church-State separation have no popular appeal, and no political and/or legal significance, whatsoever. Cheers, Santosh
