Hi Elisaeth, It is unfortunate that your views get crystallized in a reader's mind and then one is pigeon-holed. It would appear that you would like to argue an issue ... both ways. Sometimes, you do it in the same post. How can you forget my AC<>DC comment? Yet, not the way you intrepreted it!:=:)) I am still trying to figure out, if you are a cafeteria Catholic or a full blown agnostic. Perhaps if Fred had not written his post, you would have clarified it.
As I have hinted before, I am not sure it is fair for you to treat us as a punching bag for your provocative ideas. You like the praise that there is passion in your post. Yet, are you saying that your passion is fake?; And you reserve the option of making an equally passionate argument on the other side of the same issue? Hmmm.... that's like our politicians. Are you planning to run for office? The price one pays for arguing it both ways is the loss of credibility. It is not Mario! OK, it is Mario on your shempdi (tail) holding you .... to the fire.:=)) Kind Regards, GL --------- Elisabeth Carvalho wrote: it is in the same way someone in real life stands up for unfairness and injustice and tells it like it is. In much the same way as you have taken it upon yourself to distort my views on abortion, abstinence, monogamy and any other view contrary to yours, to portray me as some Dionysian disciple of the School of Hedonistic Pleasure. _______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
