--- George Pinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gilbert is definitely on to something and has really > provided his own explanation to his question > below. "Relative morality" has to do with one's > relatives as opposed to "non-relative morality" > which relates to non-relatives, both bigoted and > non-bigoted. >
Gilbert may claim that he is not an authority on religion or morality out of sheer modesty, but his wisdom has stimulated the following profound questions: Are Gilbert's relatives members of his group, or have they joined Aristo's camp? Are they defending the greatness of the first half of the Nazi regime or that of its second half? Are they reading Hitler's secret conversations between 1941 and 1944 displayed at fundamentalist religious websites, or are they reading his public speeches displayed at atheist websites e.g. http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/speeches/text/speeches.htm Are they pseudo-intellectuals, anti-intellectuals, "intellectuals", "professors" or people who cheat on their spouses? Cheers, Santosh Gilbert Lawrence wrote........... > >I am not an authority on religion or morality. Yet, >you stimulated me to think about "relative morality" >of various activities that I had outlined in my >post..... >At another time, we can have a fruitful uninterrupted >dialogue and advance the understanding of "relative >morality". > >Have you noticed how individuals in your camp freely >call others "bigoted", sadly even their own relatives? > _______________________________________________ Goanet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org
