Dear Santosh:
Vedic math to the best of my knowledge is a set of
some 16 sutras or formulae which are basically some
qucik ways of solving algebraic problems and maybe a
few related to conics...why are you against teaching
them in school? are you opposed to it being called
vedic or is there some other reason?
of course one must not claim that these sutras contain
all that is to know about algebra but simply present
them in the right perspective
as regards ayurveda, proponents argue that the
treatment is usually tailored for the individual not
for the disease..this makes more sense to me because
the human body is indeed too complex to be treated
simply as a sum of parts...
if you mean to say that ayurveda is not science
because it doesnt confirm to the standards of double
binded placebo controlled trial than you are correct
but is it fair to apply this test to ayurveda
especially when the treatment is not uniform? isnt
that an assumption made in these clinical trials?
as regards astrology i am as sceptical as you are but
are you opposed to the idea that we ned to study it
only maybe to conclusively debunk it? wouldnt it be
against the scientific temperament to simply reject it
outright?
Regards
Bhandare
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
