On 24/02/2008, anand virgincar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Goanetters,
1: I can only presume that those who were involved in the serious incidents mentioned are no longer gracing Goanet with their presence. 2: Since these are important questions ( as Jose-bab's personal experiences display ) , I feel we should give these individuals another week or so 3: Those involved in these (mis)adventures should be able to identify their involvement with ease ( unless they have a brain the size of a peanut ) 4: (I) note that I stand corrected on the fact that the JC issue was much more serious than I thought ) 5: please ignore the bit about Chinmay's family name == Dear Anandbab, I cannot with certainty state that those who abuse/accuse others without reason ... are "gracing" anything. I could virtually assure you that the bogus allegers are occasionally/more than occasionally posting on GoaNet. wrt Bhandare/Bhandari: his postings speak for themselves. From what I known - he is not a spinner in the cricketing sense. Yet, he appears to have this uncanny penchant for spinning his own 'facts'. (please vide appendix infra for one of his fact-free posts) I would not stick out my neck and defend him. jc BTW: where is the re-originator of the 'Question Everything' quote? The very simple but principal question asked of him wrt the "Hearsay v Fact finding mission" remains unanswered. === APPENDIX Bhandare's fact-free postings http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2007-December/067198.html
