Hi Victor and Selma
Despite our very first spat on Goanet, I reiterate strongly and publicly that, 
I have the highest personal regard for Frederick Noronha and his general vision 
for Goanet--that I have repeatedly said is an esteemed website for Goans 
generally.

However, there are things that are seriously amiss on Goanet moderation linked 
to the rejection of posts. That, there is now virtually a 'litany' from so many 
people consistently and independently emphasising problems with Goanet 
moderation, suggests that they cannot all be wrong or have ill intentions to 
undermine Goanet. In fact their expressed concerns suggest the very opposite 
when also noting that their Goanet rejected posts can readily find welcome 
acceptance on other Goan related websites. 

Goanet theory and practice on moderation needs a serious re-think in my humble 
opinion. Minimally, for a web-site, it is punitively inclined and not at all 
user-friendly. It therefore needs much rectification and I will spell this out, 
yet again, as soon as I get an opportunity. Above all, any criticisms of Goanet 
moderation must be made available to mainstream Goanetters and not confined 
privately to a ding dong between a moderataor and a critic. Otherwise, 
mainstream Goanetters are regularly kept in the dark about issues that need to 
see the light of day. They really ought to have the opportunity to reflect on 
issues that are not unnecessarily first 'filtered through' by moderators with 
marked contrasting visions of what moderation means--assuming it is needed at 
all or at least to the vice like grip it currently holds. Indeed, I think 
Miguel more than anyone else has alluded to this particular point. Further, 
many of Mario's (among others) insightful
 observations on moderation need to be considered rather than invariably 
rejected out of hand. 

I believe Goanet is big enough to cope with any internal criticism and will be 
the better for acknowledging and addressing criticism instead of habitually 
having it dismissed as "inappropriate". I also think that, some recent thoughts 
from Eddie Fernandes, to systematically streamline the masses of information 
from Goanet is definitely worthy of serious consideration.  
Cornel DaCosta



--- On Thu, 2/10/08, Victor Rangel-Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>      Thank you for this excellent post, Selma. I have
> made many friends through Goanet, and had many arguments
> with posters who hold diametrically opposed views, but such
> differences of opinion should not destroy friendships or the
> regard members have for one another.
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 10/2/08, Carvalho
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> First of all let me say that the internet is an evil form
> of communication. It denies us every form of sensory reception and yet 
> affords us the opportunity for intellectual stimulation. Given this 
> limitation, our friendships are formed based on shared opinions, but ruptured 
> at the drop of a hat...
  • ... Carvalho
    • ... Victor Rangel-Ribeiro
      • ... CORNEL DACOSTA
    • ... Frederick [FN] Noronha * फ्रेडरिक नोरोन्या
    • ... Carvalho
      • ... Alfred de Tavares

Reply via email to