I have no idea why the archeological evidence had to be refuted at all. This case should have been decided on the basis of the question of whether in a secular democracy people ought to be allowed to rebuild original religious structures by demolishing all the currently existing structures built on top of them. Any objective and impartial person would say no.
Cheers, Santosh --- On Sat, 10/9/10, anil desai <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is an interesting snippet. > > http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/How-Allahabad-HC-exposed-experts-espousing-Masjid-cause/articleshow/6716643.cms > > I wonder how many such 'experts' are writing in the Indian > media and being > interviewed by the likes of Burqua and Rajdeeps of Indian > TV? > > Anil Desai >
