Dear Josebab,

I agree that the judgment is confusing. My only lay sense from what I could 
glean from it is that it is an imperfect compromise. What I would have liked to 
see is if the judges had found a way to make some ruling that would prevent 
Hindu extremists and others like them from demolishing existing historical or 
religious structures in the future.

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Mon, 10/11/10, J. Colaco < jc> <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> My dear Santoshbab,
> 
> The only judgment which is relatively organised and
> readable is that
> of Justice Khan. The other two have made a good falooda
> between the
> Land rights and Beliefs.
> 
> I am not so sure that the Lemon was bad. The Lemonade is
> certainly
> confusing. Whether the judgment is based on the Law of the
> land -
> should probably be best decided by the Supreme Court.
> 
> As I probably mentioned before, I am wondering about the
> tiny Catholic
> church on the Anjediva Island.
> 
> There are two ways of bringing down Heritage structures:
> (a) by just
> destroying them (b) by preventing their use and allowing
> neglect to
> take over.
> 
> jc
> 


      

Reply via email to