Dear Albert,
Thank you for bringing the debate on Anti-Portuguese resolutions back on track. This debate has nothing to do with Catholics and Hindus and for that matter Portuguese any more. This debate is whether the so called handful of RSS/BJP indoctrinated zombies who call themselves freedom fighters can hold GOA and Goans to ransom. This debate is about stopping the free dole to louts who go by the name of freedom fighters.
Goa has never been freed.
Goa has gained another colonizer worst than the previous one.
Goans want colonizers out, and these lout freedom fighters to be burnt at the stake like in the auto da fe'. The first ones to be well done back to back is Naguesh Karmali and Flavian Dias.

"Tenkam Pensiona'm khaun khaun bori datt chorob mandlea teh chorben uzo purian paloutolo zho porto porto petou'mcho podtolo punn cainch nezo"

Vava Goa, Viva Portugal, Viva Goa's COMUNIDADES
Death to traitor Freedom Fighters.

Cheers
floriano
goasuraj
www.goasu-raj.org

PS: If more Goans from every corner of Goa come out like Albert D'Souza, Goa will be free from this louts and tics who suck Goa's blood in the name of Freedom Fighters and liberation of Goa.



----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert Desouza" <[email protected]>
To: "Major domo goanet" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Anti-Portuguese resolutionsi



Dear GoanettersA few handful citizens called freedom fighters cannot rule goa. Infact they as freedom fighters have done nothing to liberate Goa from the hands of portuguese and hence all other goans not included in the list of freedom fighters should come together and fight to stop the pension and other benefits of these freedom fighters as they had not done anything for our goa nor are doing anything to prevent our land being robbed by sharks .albert

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 02:11:02 +0530
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Anti-Portuguese resolutions


From: "Gabe Menezes" <[email protected]>
U. G. Barad <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Gabe Menezes question (refer: Message: 2, Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010): >>> Does

Reply via email to