Impeachment Proceedings against the Judge The significance of this event is drown by overwhelming focus on Anna`s crusade against corruption The provision, as a safeguard existed all the while. Its operation needs support of both houses With wafer thin majority of the parties and infighting among them and partisan attitudes ,it is difficult to master the required numbers For the first time in long history of the country,three committees have found him guilty of offences of not filling returns for 18 years, not accounting money of court collected as the receiver etc. The momentum for his impeachment is certainly a possibility, unless the Congress party back tracks and earns the wrath of the people for further encouraging corruption . Anna wants judiciary to be included in the Lok Pal Bill as many judges have been found to be patronizing corrupt means either to dispense justice or enrich themselves.. In his spirited defense he accused them of making it a test case to clean judiciary, selectivity of approach omitting other known cases.To file a case against the judge the permission of supreme court judge is needed and it is Anna contention that this be removed so that proceedings against judges be made more accessible and proceedings against corruption be less laborious One cannot understand why the judges refuse,refrain and resist to disclose their income For all purposes their legal income is their salary emoluments and related to it. What do they have to hide ,if they are innocent.? Earlier impeachment proceedings had to be dropped due uncertainty of numbers. Nelson Lopes chinchinim 9850926276
