On 4/16/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/15/06, Lucas Correia Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Might be interesting to try passing that parameter to mksquashfs (and > > see how much the file size will increase), or do a rollback of the > > Unionfs patch version. The current UnionFS version is 1.1.3, but I've > > just seen that 1.1.4 is out now. > > > > I checked, for 2.6.16 we should use unionfs 1.2.x which is currently > only in CVS. Should we use it (or look for more patches), or wait for > unionfs to stabilize.
Aah, good to know that. I think it's ok try the CVS, if there are bugs reported on the version we have been using so far. -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
