2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/6/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3
> > > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc.
> > > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe by running gobo inside qemu or
> > > other emulator.. I don't have the time to test that right now,
> > > unfortunately.
> > >
> >
> > I tested a Glibc upgrade in qemu. Fresh 013 install. InstallPackage
> > Scripts and Compile. Compile DHCPCD (we need a new bin package).
> > InstallPackage Glibc. D/L and sig check fine. During SyminkProgram,
> > fine until ldconfig, then get "FATAL: kernel too old" error messages.
> > Now nothing works. On reboot, init dies with "FATAL: kernel too old".
> > I'll upgrade kernels and check again.
>
> I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can be a problem.
> Should be the case of adding Linux 2.6.x to Glibc's dependencies and
> then creating a Linux package that presents
> /System/Kernel/{Boot,Modules} + /Files/Compile/Sources/linux-2.6.x
> (sanitized) inside Unmanaged? Seems to be a better way to handle the
> kernel package and fix the Glibc issue, right?
>
I have thought about this but I don't like the idea of having
everything for the kernel doubled, once in /Programs/Linux and the
other at the "correct" places. I'm still trying to find a good way for
this.
And I still think that the image and the source should be in separate
packages anyway.
--
/Jonas
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
