On 3/6/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/6, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I think this can have something to do with glibc's --with-kernel
> > parameter. We used a very recent release, so this can be a problem.
> > Should be the case of adding Linux 2.6.x to Glibc's dependencies and
> > then creating a Linux package that presents
> > /System/Kernel/{Boot,Modules} + /Files/Compile/Sources/linux-2.6.x
> > (sanitized) inside Unmanaged? Seems to be a better way to handle the
> > kernel package and fix the Glibc issue, right?
> >With a 2.6.20 kernel everything is fine. It was actually VERY smooth. Nice job. > I have thought about this but I don't like the idea of having > everything for the kernel doubled, once in /Programs/Linux and the > other at the "correct" places. I'm still trying to find a good way for > this. > > And I still think that the image and the source should be in separate > packages anyway. > Disk space is cheap. I guess we could have a config file somewhere to prune Unmanaged. It would we worthwhile for packages other than the kernel if the user really cares. Kernel sources as a sep package makes sense but should be included on the ISO. Should also be in the Typical profile as well. This is linux and compiling out of tree kernel modules isn't that odd. -- Carlo J. Calica _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
