On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 03:43:44 +0200, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/25/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Having submitted several binary packages and had some chats on IRC with users >> trying to install the same packages I came to the conclusion that we need to >> rework the dependency scheme a lot. >> >> First I'd like to change dependencies to be none recursive. > I agree. It's not really necessary (now), and it'd be clearer if they > weren't all listed. Ok. I've thought about it and I can't see nothing against this and even if there were, I think the pros will weight out the cons, also those that have commented on this was positive, so I commited the changes. As in my commit message, for example toolkits, e.g. GTK+, can be compiled agains any X server and applications using that toolkit doesn't have to know. CheckDependencies takes care of the recursion. I still want comments and ideas on the new scheme. :) -- /Jonas Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
