On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just to make it official, as we've already talked about this before: > > yes, this seems to be a sane approach to handle dependencies. > > BuildDependencies, however, should be left untouched, as it's a good > > source for hints when something goes wrong. > > Did you mean BuildInformation, perchance?
Oh, yes, sure. I had the "Dependencies" word in mind when I wrote that :) -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
