"Michael Homer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] but we still need them from > Dan, Guillherme, Rafael, MJ, and Aitor. [...]
I'm fine with GPL2+ for any of my contributions here. > The idea of setting up a formal organisation, and possibly doing > copyright assignment to that, was also raised, but I think shelved for > the moment. It would be good to get an idea of how people would feel > about that as well. Sounds a bloody stupid idea on two levels. :-) 1. There are many formal organisations available already (www.spi-inc.org for example), so if we are going to set up another, there should be a damn good reason why, else we're just making unnecessary admin work for ourselves and spending time which would be better spent on an existing organisation. 2. Copyright assignment seems less good than Fiduciary Licensing Agreements or similar. Even then, you need a pretty high level of trust to surrender what little influence over your code you have and a new organisation just won't have that. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
