Hi Iván, Thanks for taking the time to make the benchmarks! However, it only makes sense to compare your framework against the other frameworks running in the same setting (same machine, same OS *etc.*), hence your current benchmarks tell us very little. IMO, your best bet to popularize your framework, as you are the last newcomer to "join the party", is to actually compare it against other similar frameworks.
Cheers, Marko On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 at 15:10, Iván Corrales Solera < ivan.corrales.sol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Marko, > > I already have benchmark for Koazee... Many changes have been done in code > in order to improve the performance (At the moment being focused on > improve performance for primitive types). Make comparison with other > frameworks is complicated to me but I invite the owners of other similar > tools to run the re-use my tests! > > Benchmark report can be found here: > https://github.com/wesovilabs/koazee/wiki/Benchmark-Report > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 8:59:20 AM UTC+1, Marko Ristin wrote: >> >> Hi Ivan, >> Any performance comparisons with other approaches would be greatly >> appreciated and I assume they would also help the adoption a lot. >> >> Cheers Marko >> >> Le lun. 12 nov. 2018 à 08:20, Iván Corrales Solera < >> ivan.corra...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> Hey Marko, >>> >>> Thanks you so much for your reply!, >>> >>> >>> To be honest I didn't know about this libraries, but after having a >>> quick look at them I see that >>> >>> The set of provided operations in https://github.com/clementauger/st >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fclementauger%2Fst&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEsEhCmQcTsSIkE1qjuZWDLTZ_WtQ> >>> is >>> more reduced (but I assume it will be increased), and in the case of >>> https://github.com/ahmetb/go-linq >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fahmetb%2Fgo-linq&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHG4JEY4oprhvHToz-Man5NHQuwdQ> >>> I >>> should take time to having a look and find the difference, because like >>> Koazee both are based on Lazy evaluation, so the provided functionality is >>> similar. >>> >>> As a strong point of koazee I would say the documentation, >>> http://wesovilabs.com/koazee/ and that Koazee is only 1 week from I >>> started to code it, then there are and much more possibilities are >>> supported, >>> >>> In fact,An hour ago, I just created some issues which will provide >>> extra functionality not provided by https://github.com/ahmetb/go-linq >>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fahmetb%2Fgo-linq&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHG4JEY4oprhvHToz-Man5NHQuwdQ> >>> for example this one >>> >>> https://github.com/wesovilabs/koazee/issues/2 >>> >>> In fact any new issues or suggestion will be great! >>> >>> Thank you so much again >>> >>> >>> On Monday, November 12, 2018 at 8:01:28 AM UTC+1, Marko Ristin wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi! >>>> Could you give a comparison to other similar libraries such as >>>> https://github.com/clementauger/st >>>> https://github.com/ahmetb/go-linq >>>> ? >>>> >>>> Cheers Marko >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
