I filed an issue requesting that the Go team issue RFPs to both communicate directions they plan to go in, and solicit community input about them. It was declined.
proposal: Go 2: establish RFP/RFC process for language feature proposals https://github.com/golang/go/issues/29860 Part of my reasoning was that the Go 2 Error Handling Draft Design lacked a discussion of "requirements". IMHO a well-developed set of requirements (and revised with community input) would have been more valuable than a design proposal which fulfills unspecified requirements. On Thursday, May 23, 2019 at 5:50:22 PM UTC-7, lgo...@gmail.com wrote: > > Ian: I find many of your comments related to how the Go team functions > very interesting, > I for one would find it helpful if 2 or 3 times a year the Go Team would > communicate to the Go community at large, information related to where and > in what direction(s) it is taking Go, and what directions the team has > decided NOT to take Go . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/113be4cf-9273-4a49-82f1-636ba1930ea2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
