On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:37 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Don't get me wrong. No doubt there are use cases which cannot be > solved reasonably without generics. No doubt there are many other > cases where generics will be an elegant and still readable solution > either. > > I don't disagree on this view. More expressive power in a language is also more power to make incomprehensible APIs. I've seen my fair share of interface-heavy APIs which shouldn't have used interfaces in the first place, or should have been placed at a different layer of abstraction.
I've also seen my fair share of Haskell code where the problem is also present. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiX6CdGPx76z-QZ3jz-Rr8E-LX36%2B%2BD8p_fh5HF1CnUh%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
