I don't know how Go users can be ‘anti interface’ - literally 95% of the stdlib 
is based on interfaces. If you use the stdlib, you use interfaces.

> On Dec 30, 2020, at 9:44 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen 
> <jesper.louis.ander...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:37 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:0xj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Don't get me wrong. No doubt there are use cases which cannot be
> solved reasonably without generics. No doubt there are many other
> cases where generics will be an elegant and still readable solution
> either.
> 
> 
> I don't disagree on this view. More expressive power in a language is also
> more power to make incomprehensible APIs. I've seen my fair share of
> interface-heavy APIs which shouldn't have used interfaces in the first place,
> or should have been placed at a different layer of abstraction.
> 
> I've also seen my fair share of Haskell code where the problem is also 
> present.
> 
> -- 
> J.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiX6CdGPx76z-QZ3jz-Rr8E-LX36%2B%2BD8p_fh5HF1CnUh%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiX6CdGPx76z-QZ3jz-Rr8E-LX36%2B%2BD8p_fh5HF1CnUh%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/8E6FD1E2-48E7-46F5-B5D1-422AF1E6F916%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to