Agreed.

I had proposed a different approach, where the built-in map and slice could 
have alternative implementations chosen during make(). 95% of generics usage is 
collections. I think this would have retained the simplicity of Go a bit better 
than generics - but at the end of day - generics are not “difficult". Bad 
programmers write bad code without generics.

> On Dec 30, 2020, at 5:15 PM, Amnon <amno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would like a type-safe version of sync.Map().
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 23:02:48 UTC ren...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> I don't know how Go users can be ‘anti interface’ - literally 95% of the 
> stdlib is based on interfaces. If you use the stdlib, you use interfaces.
> 
> 
>> On Dec 30, 2020, at 9:44 AM, Jesper Louis Andersen <jesper.lou...@gmail.com 
>> <applewebdata://855D994B-0514-4139-8577-9F7CD76D8029>> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 3:37 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com 
>> <applewebdata://855D994B-0514-4139-8577-9F7CD76D8029>> wrote:
>> 
>> Don't get me wrong. No doubt there are use cases which cannot be
>> solved reasonably without generics. No doubt there are many other
>> cases where generics will be an elegant and still readable solution
>> either.
>> 
>> 
>> I don't disagree on this view. More expressive power in a language is also
>> more power to make incomprehensible APIs. I've seen my fair share of
>> interface-heavy APIs which shouldn't have used interfaces in the first place,
>> or should have been placed at a different layer of abstraction.
>> 
>> I've also seen my fair share of Haskell code where the problem is also 
>> present.
>> 
>> -- 
>> J.
>> 
> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com 
>> <applewebdata://855D994B-0514-4139-8577-9F7CD76D8029>.
> 
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiX6CdGPx76z-QZ3jz-Rr8E-LX36%2B%2BD8p_fh5HF1CnUh%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiX6CdGPx76z-QZ3jz-Rr8E-LX36%2B%2BD8p_fh5HF1CnUh%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/483c3f92-097e-4954-b4df-135b6ab561e4n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/483c3f92-097e-4954-b4df-135b6ab561e4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/00594B09-CB09-43F5-9ECA-328E2016846A%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to