Thanks Jeremy.. Can someone from Google clarify? I can't base a project around "should (theoretically)"!!
Also is there anyway to update the cache (for changed entries)? An automatic check would be great but a force update mode would work too. An example would be a wordpress blog with typically 10 entries in the feed. The user can change the feed length temporarily, would the new updated entries be re-cached or would the old content remain? Thanks Chris On Dec 28 2009, 9:34 am, Jeremy Geerdes <[email protected]> wrote: > The AJAX Feeds API depends on the same FeedFetcher bot which caches > feeds for Google Reader. So if you load something in Reader, it should > (theoretically) be cached in the Feeds API. > > Jeremy R. Geerdes > Effective website design & development > Des Moines, IA > > For more information or a project > quote:http://jgeerdes.home.mchsi.comhttp://jgeerdes.blogspot.comhttp://jgeerdes.wordpress.com > [email protected] > > Unless otherwise noted, any price quotes contained within this > communication are given in US dollars. > > If you're in the Des Moines, IA, area, check out Debra Heights > Wesleyan Church! > > And check out my blog, Adventures in Web Development, > athttp://jgeerdes.blogspot.com > ! > > On Dec 28, 2009, at 8:32 AM, SV Billabong wrote: > > > Does Google have a single feed database or is the AJAX feed controlled > > separately? > > > I'm interested in historical entries and wondering if loading the feed > > in Google Reader also "stores" these historical entries for the AJAX > > feed extraction. > > > Will the feed be constantly updated (daily?) or does a AJAX feed based > > utility need to be run in order to trigger a fetch in order to store > > entries? > > > Thanks > > > Chris > > > On Dec 19, 9:52 am, SV Billabong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Jeff.. > > >> Can you let us know here when it rolls out? > > >> On Dec 18, 1:09 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Yes during debugging I was able to update the two feeds that were > >>> reported in this thread. A more permanent solution should be rolled > >>> out in our system shortly. > > >>> Happy coding, > > >>> Jeff > > >>> On Dec 17, 5:23 pm, braiiins <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Not sure if you found the problem, but it's updated! Thanks! > > >>>> On Dec 16, 12:18 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Yes this does seem like a bug and it is proving difficult to track > >>>>> down. We've been working on this and I'll keep this thread updated > >>>>> with progress. Apologies for the delay! > > >>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>> Jeff > > >>>>> On Dec 14, 5:55 pm, braiiins <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Any thoughts on my problem? It'll be 3 weeks tomorrow and it > >>>>>> still > >>>>>> won't update. I do have over 1000 feed readers, so it's not > >>>>>> that it's > >>>>>> not viewed enough. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Google AJAX APIs" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > . > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-ajax-search-api?hl=en > > . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google AJAX APIs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-ajax-search-api?hl=en.
