Thanks Jeff, Is it possible to get more than 250 entries?
On Jan 4, 4:40 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > The feeds system does take into account the caching information > provided in the HTTP headers for your RSS/Atom feed. So if for example > there is a blog post which the headers say, for example, can be cached > for a couple of months, then they may not be updated before then, so > recent changes might not be picked up. Currently the server doesn't > pass along any cache-control headers which the client might send, > which means there isn't a mechanism for the client to invalidate the > cache. You may have to wait for the item to outlive the cache time > before it would be refetched. If you are concerned about edits not > showing up, perhaps you could set a shorter cache time on more > frequently updated items and use longer cache settings for posts which > are going to be updated less often. > > Thank you, > > Jeff > > On Jan 4, 8:47 am, SV Billabong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Jeremy.. > > > Can someone from Google clarify? I can't base a project around "should > > (theoretically)"!! > > > Also is there anyway to update the cache (for changed entries)? An > > automatic check would be great but a force update mode would work too. > > > An example would be a wordpress blog with typically 10 entries in the > > feed. The user can change the feed length temporarily, would the new > > updated entries be re-cached or would the old content remain? > > > Thanks > > > Chris > > > On Dec 28 2009, 9:34 am, Jeremy Geerdes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The AJAX Feeds API depends on the same FeedFetcher bot which caches > > > feeds for Google Reader. So if you load something in Reader, it should > > > (theoretically) be cached in the Feeds API. > > > > Jeremy R. Geerdes > > > Effective website design & development > > > Des Moines, IA > > > > For more information or a project > > > quote:http://jgeerdes.home.mchsi.comhttp://jgeerdes.blogspot.comhttp://jgee... > > > [email protected] > > > > Unless otherwise noted, any price quotes contained within this > > > communication are given in US dollars. > > > > If you're in the Des Moines, IA, area, check out Debra Heights > > > Wesleyan Church! > > > > And check out my blog, Adventures in Web Development, > > > athttp://jgeerdes.blogspot.com > > > ! > > > > On Dec 28, 2009, at 8:32 AM, SV Billabong wrote: > > > > > Does Google have a single feed database or is the AJAX feed controlled > > > > separately? > > > > > I'm interested in historical entries and wondering if loading the feed > > > > in Google Reader also "stores" these historical entries for the AJAX > > > > feed extraction. > > > > > Will the feed be constantly updated (daily?) or does a AJAX feed based > > > > utility need to be run in order to trigger a fetch in order to store > > > > entries? > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Chris > > > > > On Dec 19, 9:52 am, SV Billabong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Jeff.. > > > > >> Can you let us know here when it rolls out? > > > > >> On Dec 18, 1:09 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> Yes during debugging I was able to update the two feeds that were > > > >>> reported in this thread. A more permanent solution should be rolled > > > >>> out in our system shortly. > > > > >>> Happy coding, > > > > >>> Jeff > > > > >>> On Dec 17, 5:23 pm, braiiins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> Not sure if you found the problem, but it's updated! Thanks! > > > > >>>> On Dec 16, 12:18 pm, "Jeff S (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>> Yes this does seem like a bug and it is proving difficult to track > > > >>>>> down. We've been working on this and I'll keep this thread updated > > > >>>>> with progress. Apologies for the delay! > > > > >>>>> Thank you, > > > > >>>>> Jeff > > > > >>>>> On Dec 14, 5:55 pm, braiiins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> Any thoughts on my problem? It'll be 3 weeks tomorrow and it > > > >>>>>> still > > > >>>>>> won't update. I do have over 1000 feed readers, so it's not > > > >>>>>> that it's > > > >>>>>> not viewed enough. > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > Groups "Google AJAX APIs" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > [email protected] > > > > . > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected] > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group > > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-ajax-search-api?hl=en > > > > .
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google AJAX APIs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-ajax-search-api?hl=en.
