> Well, it sounds so. But does (or can/will) Datanucleus support at least > some of the features Jeff has mentioned?
Yes, several actually. And nothing is "dog slow", ... though why dogs get such a bad reputation I've no idea; take a greyhound for example ... :-) The question was "is caching in DataNucleus simple and transparent"; that's the question I answered. Not sure also why people always want to make things into a "mines better than yours contest". The only statements you'll see from me on here are in answer to specific questions about software that uses DataNucleus (and Googles plugin does that, with the emphasis on being owned by Google, and not being part of the DataNucleus project), with the attempt to aid that person use the software better. Nowhere have I ever made any comment on Objectify's capabilities or made any criticism of it (or of similar software, such as Twig, Morphia) - perhaps due to the fact that I understand only too well how much time and effort is taken to develop something of that form. All software has particular features, and their own advantages and disadvantages ... DataNucleus (and Google's plugin) has plenty of things going for it, as does Objectify. It's for the user to choose what best fits *their* requirements using their judgement, not for people to spend time criticising. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine for Java" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
