IMO, I think source code download is a great disaster recovery option that should have a $$$ price tag associated with it.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Tim Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > This was nearly introduced, and the community overwhelmingly rejected > the proposal. > There are a number of issues that such a facility introduces. > > Using a shared fileservice or source code control (actually a much > better strategy) is what > you should be using. > > I don't think Ikai was being humorous. It might be worth reviewing > this thread to see just how negative the facility was received. > > Rgds > > Tim Hoffman > > On Oct 23, 9:43 am, mykhal <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 18, 10:26 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" > > <[email protected]<ikai.l%[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Have you looked into Dropbox? > > > > >https://www.dropbox.com/ > > > > > There is a free offering. > > > > yes, humor is a nice way to gloss over something > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-appengine%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
