I think community here has by a vast majority rejected the idea of code downloading at least as default (opt out) option. I also do not like the idea of a payable service, since it will complicate the pricing model, will attract criticism against the platform and help guys who are in the business of doing unresonabel GAE vs S3 vs whatever_looks_like_cloud comparisons happy.
But ... then again who am I to tell mother G what to do ? -:) On Oct 23, 10:00 pm, "A. Stevko" <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO, I think source code download is a great disaster recovery option that > should have a $$$ price tag associated with it. > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Tim Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > This was nearly introduced, and the community overwhelmingly rejected > > the proposal. > > There are a number of issues that such a facility introduces. > > > Using a shared fileservice or source code control (actually a much > > better strategy) is what > > you should be using. > > > I don't think Ikai was being humorous. It might be worth reviewing > > this thread to see just how negative the facility was received. > > > Rgds > > > Tim Hoffman > > > On Oct 23, 9:43 am, mykhal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Oct 18, 10:26 pm, "Ikai Lan (Google)" > > > <[email protected]<ikai.l%[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Have you looked into Dropbox? > > > > >https://www.dropbox.com/ > > > > > There is a free offering. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
