On Mar 28, 1:24 am, Robert Kluin <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting idea, > it's like Google search minus the search (ie with > only the 'sponsored' results).
Yes. This has been my intention. But since I don’t have a search engine indexing the web I thought about going back to the early days of the internet where people actually submitted their links to search engines to be indexed. > In any event, glad you're learning and > having fun with Python and App Engine. Yes, and it’s fun to use something that I built myself. Thanks to you and everyone here for the help with my questions; that makes a big difference. > Would probably be helpful if you had some way to view all tags. True. First, the related tags were pulled only from the tags on the 7 items displayed; but then I changed that; now I fetch(100) and display the related tags for the 100 items. > It would be nice to 'browse' the tags. I agree. Next I will create a “browse tags” page. > You could also update the search results to indicate which terms were used > for a particular search and how they were combined (are they ORed or ANDed?). I am planning to create a new table to store the searches so that I can offer suggestions for selecting tags. So if people are searching “android tablet” more than “anroid tablets” (as in google https://adwords.google.com/o/Targeting/Explorer?__u=1000000000&__c=1000000000&ideaRequestType=KEYWORD_IDEAS#search.none) then it make more sense to invest on the tag “android tablet” than “android tablets”. (but I will also update search algorithm to account for the plural of words) > Might also be cool to see some info about the 'paid rank' and/or click count > of each link. Yes. Definitely. Added to feature list. Thanks agains for the comments. > Hi Zeynel, > Interesting idea, it's like Google search minus the search (ie with > only the 'sponsored' results). In any event, glad you're learning and > having fun with Python and App Engine. > > Would probably be helpful if you had some way to view all tags. It > would be nice to 'browse' the tags. You could also update the search > results to indicate which terms were used for a particular search and > how they were combined (are they ORed or ANDed?). Might also be cool > to see some info about the 'paid rank' and/or click count of each > link. > > Robert > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 19:27, Zeynel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I posted the link to my application a few days ago to HN but there > > were no comments so I reposted it today with the offer in the title to > > encourage comments:http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2366115 > > > Please take a look and let me know what you think. > > >http://ting-1.appspot.com/ > > > And thanks again to everyone here who helped with my questions. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
