So is Guido finally getting rid of the GIL :-) On May 10, 10:00 pm, "Gregory D'alesandre" <[email protected]> wrote: > For the time being that is indeed true. We are working on ways to bring > concurrency to Python but don't have anything we can announce just yet. Go > is currently single-threaded, but this too is something that could change > over time. > > Greg > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Ugorji <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > Thanks much for the response. I understand responses will be slow this > > week. > > > For once, it now seems that Java has an advantage, as Python (and GO) users > > do not have the option of using multi-threaded to reduce the number of > > instances. So although Python (and GO) will *potentially use less resources > > and a lower footprint, will they now get charged more due to a limitation in > > the app engine runtime? > > > I've been developing with Java, but am pretty excited about GO's inclusion. > > This seems to be a bottleneck. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google App Engine" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
