On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Daniel Florey wrote: > running as a multi-tenancy app is not doable for several reasons: > - Clients want to be able to protect the data by managing the permissions > (=access to the datastore) by themselves
I suspect that this desire would be gated by cost. That is, for customers who want to do this, they pay $15/month ($9 to google + your fee). For customer who can live without this control, you offer them a cheaper version that doesn't have this ability (the multi-tenant version). > - The app can use a lot of resources depending on the settings of the > customer. I don't see a simply way to charge them for the resources consumed > when using a multi-tenancy app If it were simple, you wouldn't have a business. :) Seriously, though, you could easily apply caps on the user's settings or usage when they opt in to the multi-tenant version, and if they need to exceed those, they bump up to the private $15/month (minimum) version. -Joshua -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
