Thanks for pointing Jeff, will add more fields! On Nov 24, 2011 12:51 PM, "Jeff Schnitzer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am not one of your unhappy developers, but I looked at your survey and > it seems pretty pointless. Let me suggest a few additions that might give > it some value: > > * Java / Python / Python27? > * Have you tried multithreading? yes/no > * How long have you been developing on appengine? <3mo, 6mo, 1 yr, 2yr, > more than 2yr > * What is your monthly billing? Free, <$10, $10-$50, $50-$100, > $100-$1000, more than $1000 > > You can adjust the suggested numbers as you like. > > You could do even better by breaking down your "how unhappy are you?" > questions by component: Datastore, Task Queue, Memcache, Channels, Email, > etc. > > Jeff > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Andrius A <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, we all do mistakes and GAE platform is great. But this thread is not >> about this discussion. So if you have any outstanding issues fill in the >> form! >> >> Personally I can't understand how you can be happy with price increase >> and production issues with python 2.7 >> I totally believe that for hosting just html in app engine is great but >> if you try using more apis such as backends, channels, task queues you will >> come up to lots of problems. >> On Nov 24, 2011 12:10 PM, "Simon Knott" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> In my experience on the GAE forums, a lot of "unhappy" developers I see >>> are actually the people who don't understand the GAE architecture and have >>> poorly designed applications for the environment. Their applications are >>> subsequently slow and/or expensive to run, for example because they haven't >>> denormalised their data structure or they've indexed every property under >>> the sun, and they then lay the blame on Google. I personally applaud the >>> development team who provide adhoc support on these forums, as they have >>> far more patience than I have! >>> >>> I'm not saying that there couldn't be some improvements to the support >>> channels for genuine issues with the service and I would love to have a >>> more tiered structure, as someone has suggested in the last day, so that >>> smaller companies could get support for less money, within a larger SLA. >>> It will be interesting to see who responds to your questionnaire and the >>> complaints that are aired. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Simon >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Google App Engine" group. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/WRUFpsUp6IcJ. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > I am the 20% > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
