Hi Brian,

I am not happy because 2.7 is still experimental but pricing is increased,
and I will be even more unhappy if by 1st December with fronted price
increase python 2.7 will still be experimental.

and to add to this there are more production issues I was writing but
unfortunately haven't received an answer. Here is the list:

1) Broken backends in SDK:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-python/browse_thread/...<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-python/browse_thread/thread/cf37410a6cf45283/425548774212402f%3Fq%3D%23425548774212402f&usg=AFQjCNHiAuNVzUPyZFKcbjg_7YF83qfjDA>


2) Unexplained random frontend response latency:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/ad3c7473b34152ba/d187cb8acc295066%3Fq%3D%23d187cb8acc295066&usg=AFQjCNGAbz_N7V41eK_bJOVpVamfBrY0xg>


3) Memcache expiry time setting bug:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/...<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/d0dca5913d33f3d1/bfd9117ad45ba516%3Fq%3D%23bfd9117ad45ba516&usg=AFQjCNGTzoND8L5rybwCrVGlcUKL8ml_lw>


4) Channel API not working in backends:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5123<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail%3Fid%3D5123&usg=AFQjCNGf37hfVjHzH50xrXasmAfLdW1v-A>
 (Issue
raised in May 27)
5) Cant delete tasks from Backends:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-python/browse_thread/thread/f1f674891cb5a2c1/9895847d1525d9e1#9895847d1525d9e1

Thanks,
Andrius

On 24 November 2011 20:33, Brian Quinlan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Andrius,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Andrius A <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, we all do mistakes and GAE platform is great. But this thread is not
> > about this discussion. So if you have any outstanding issues fill in the
> > form!
> >
> > Personally I can't understand how you can be happy with price increase
> and
> > production issues with python 2.7
>
> As an experimental release, we were expecting significant issues with
> the Python 2.7 runtime (i.e. instability, missing features,
> performance problems) and I've actually been pleasantly surprised at
> how few have been found (thanks to everyone for helping us test!).
>
> Are you unhappy with Python 2.7 production issues because we didn't
> adequately explain that you might experience problems when using it?
> Or is there some other reason?
>
> Cheers,
> Brian
>
> > I totally believe that for hosting just html in app engine is great but
> if
> > you try using more apis such as backends, channels, task queues you will
> > come up to lots of problems.
> >
> > On Nov 24, 2011 12:10 PM, "Simon Knott" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> In my experience on the GAE forums, a lot of "unhappy" developers I see
> >> are actually the people who don't understand the GAE architecture and
> have
> >> poorly designed applications for the environment.  Their applications
> are
> >> subsequently slow and/or expensive to run, for example because they
> haven't
> >> denormalised their data structure or they've indexed every property
> under
> >> the sun, and they then lay the blame on Google.  I personally applaud
> the
> >> development team who provide adhoc support on these forums, as they
> have far
> >> more patience than I have!
> >> I'm not saying that there couldn't be some improvements to the support
> >> channels for genuine issues with the service and I would love to have a
> more
> >> tiered structure, as someone has suggested in the last day, so that
> smaller
> >> companies could get support for less money, within a larger SLA.  It
> will be
> >> interesting to see who responds to your questionnaire and the complaints
> >> that are aired.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Simon
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >> "Google App Engine" group.
> >> To view this discussion on the web visit
> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/WRUFpsUp6IcJ.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google App Engine" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to