Should update the message when you start a new app that says it costs 3x as much.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ikai Lan (Google) Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Outages? HRD is not 3x more expensive. We lowered the cost to make it match the master/slave cost. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine plus.ikailan.com <http://plus.ikailan.com/> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Amit Sangani <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Ikan, We wouldn't mind moving to HRD from M/S, but isn't it 3X more expensive? Also, what's the minimal way to impact our users when datastore is in read-only mode during downtimes? Consider that every action our users take involves writing to a datastore. Will using memcache help? Will memcache be available without interruption during datastore downtime? thanks! Amit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/MooASjwFQ28J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:google-appengine%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
