On Sunday, February 23, 2014 6:03:43 AM UTC+8, Jay wrote: > > Tapir, I really do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Tim > was sharing his thoughts and you come back with childish stuff like this. > You are asking people to contribute their success stories to your other > thread. You have made some choices in how you responded in this thread. I > don't think those choices are likely to attract many to the other thread > you would like to get going. > > From reading some (not all, forgive me in advance - I know I'll need it) > of your posts over the last few days, it seems to me that you have already > made up your mind that GAE does not tend to meet your business > requirements. That is fine. But it seems almost as if you continue to post > in the hopes that some "white knight" is going to come along with a nugget > of information that you may have missed and make it work for you. > You have specific needs and very specific ideas. Do the work of putting > your model together and testing it. I think you have actually. If you have, > then trust your model - you have your answer. >
Hi man, none of googlers says GAE doesn't not tend to meet my business requirement. On the contrary, GAE docs shows GAE SHOULD be very suitable for my business model. I only found you and Timh said GAE doesn't not tend to meet my business requirement. What is childish do you mean? A rich man think GAE is cheap, so that everyone also should GAE is cheap? I have shown strong evidence that the core GAE Java SDK lib has a big impact on the warmup time. Even the simple official guestbook example on git has a 7-10 seconds warmup time. I think the warmup problem is the root cause of GAE Java apps need more instances. I also prove GAE compute units (instances) have a more higher prices than EC2 and GCE. If GAE team can't (or not wailing to) solve the warmup problem, they should lower the instance price. What is wrong here? I just show hard evidences. On the contrary, some people just say "Hi, I'm satisfied with GAE, so you should be satisfied with it too, otherwise, get off!" Who is childish on earth?! > > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 1:47:06 AM UTC-6, Tapir wrote: >> >> >> >> On Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:11:08 PM UTC+8, timh wrote: >>> >>> >>>> What the data all you provide exactly prove GAE is expensive! >>>> Your sense is not a typical common sense. >>>> Bill Gates will still think GAE is cheap if the F1 instance is charged >>>> with $1000 per day. >>>> >>> >>> What on earth are you smoking. How does anything I said support your >>> argument that GAE is expensive. >>> >>> At no point do you EVER compare like for like. So give us all a break. >>> >>> I said the cost of the service is far below the 3% revenue. Did you not >>> see the REALLY REALLY cheap bit. >>> I am not made of money, but people derive their revenue from other >>> sources not advertising. >>> >>> If you don't like it and it doesn't suit your revenue model then get off >>> GAE. >>> >> >> you coool! rich man. >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
