On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:10:09 PM UTC+8, Alexis wrote: > > Just to emphasize what Kaan Soral said, without going into cheapness > evaluation: > "the initial costs seem to be high, but as the traffic increases, the > costs doesn't increase proportionally. > So basically, appengine gets cost efficient with increased traffic, seems > logical - so basically you have to excuse the initial daily ~<10$ costs if > you are keeping instances and memcached alive" > > It goes way further than saving costs for keeping instances and memcache > alive. > When we launched one of our products, we had one engineer working on the > back-end side (99% AppEngine). We had a few hundred daily active users. > Then our product became very successful and we reached 5 million (!) daily > active users. We still only had one engineer working on our back-end. > > > @Tapir I'm sorry I can't really answer your 'Please share your GAE > success > stories!<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/t/945c56ecd47682d4>' > questions as I'm not allowed to share cost/revenue figures. >
You don't need to share all listed in that thread. Just share as more as possible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
