On 2010/09/26 16:03:24, metaweta wrote:
On 2010/09/26 03:28:28, Mark S. Miller wrote: > The reason you weren't seeing these dups was that your previous line > fn.f___ !== fn.apply > was buggy. After I corrected to > fn.f___ === fn.apply > I saw the error. When I change the error report to simply logging
dups, I
> see trace shown below.
No, that's how I intended it; double-taming a simple function is
harmless, but
taming it one way and then accidentally taming it as a simple function
later can
break stuff.
Restored. Made the error a tad clearer. http://codereview.appspot.com/2225043/
