The problem with replacing files with the same name is that packages versions are part of the name. For example I have built 3 versions of samba and file names are: samba-3.2.8-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz samba-3.3.0-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz samba-3.3.1-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz
Any suggestion is really welcome. Thanks, Massimiliano On Feb 26, 10:43 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, massimiliano.brocchini > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm using subversion since I know that your download are keeps storing > > old version of binaries and I need to update packages quite often (in > > almost two months I released 4-5 versions of some packages). > > Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace > them with a new object by the same name. And you have at least 2GB of > space in the downloads-quota. > > Perhaps you can move all of your packages to 'downloads', and just > keep your distribution-assembly scripts in svn? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
