On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:14 PM, massimiliano.brocchini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Feb 27, 7:28 pm, Ben Collins-Sussman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:16 AM, massimiliano.brocchini >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Actually, no, you're free to delete 'downloads' any time, and replace >> >> them with a new object by the same name. And you have at least 2GB of >> >> space in the downloads-quota. >> >> >> Perhaps you can move all of your packages to 'downloads', and just >> >> keep your distribution-assembly scripts in svn? >> >> > The problem is that the version of the package is part of the file's >> > name and I can't change that >> > E.g. I have >> > samba-3.2.8-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz >> > samba-3.3.0-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz >> > samba-3.3.1-1-i586.pkg.tar.gz >> >> Why is this a problem? Go ahead and put all of them into the >> downloads-area. Deprecate the ones which are not the most recent. > > Do deprecated versions count for disk quota usage?
Yes. Or you can just delete old objects if you don't need them anymore. > Can I deprecate versions with some command line tools (like > ScriptedUploads)? No, not yet. > How can I upload packages which are bigger than 40 MB? (e.g. jdk, > openjdk6, openoffice, etc)? You ask us to raise your limit to something larger than 40MB. :-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
