And since we offer Mercurial hosting on Google Code rather than git hosting, bitbucket.org may be a more interesting alternative for private repository hosting, depending on your source control preferences.
Note however that both of these services offer only repositories and a few related services. Most notably missing from the offering is an issue tracker. I don't have specific recommendations in mind for commercial hosting with a featureset similar to Google Code. - Dave 2009/11/3 Adam Jimerson <[email protected]>: > Maybe it should be pointed out that GitHub allows for both open and private > repos, at a pretty low cost (I have a "Small" account with them for $12 a > month and I get over a GB storage, 10 private repos, and unlimited open > repos). The biggest difference that should be expected is the use of Git > instead of SVN. I don't know if Google is planning/willing to allow for > closed source projects, and really I don't care if they do I'm just glad > Google code is a free service to open source projects. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:25 AM, David Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Google Code does not currently support private project hosting. I >> suggest you star issue >> http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=1829 to get updates >> if this situation changes in the future. >> >> - Dave >> >> 2009/11/3 李白，字一日 <[email protected]>: >> > >> > althought open source is a trend for software development. >> > there still have needs for private project hosting. >> > will google support for this? >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
