I'm not, I think it's stupid to modify the license in such a way that isn't preserved, nor is required to be preserved, from codebase to codebase. Also, when most people get their hands on that section they write permissions so poorly that they introduce restrictions on use. Warranty disclaimers often are thinly veiled field of use restrictions.
That said, it's allowed on code.google.com, and we welcome you here. :-) On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:25 PM, LWC <[email protected]> wrote: > Again (as also mentioned in the link), don't confuse additional > permissions with additional restrictions. Please read that link (and > GPLv3's Section 7) carefully. Additional restrictions is a closed > list. Any other restriction falls the "Alll other non-permissive > additional terms". > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en. > > -- Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc. Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at http://code.google.com Personal Site and Weblog: http://dibona.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.
