I should have pasted the whole paragraph, where the removal language is, sorry. This thread is getting overly long any how.
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Chris DiBona <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this bit is important too, in case you think I'm overly > fixated on permissions (which I am, but whatever) > > "If a license document contains a further restriction but permits > relicensing or conveying under this > License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms > of that license document, provided that the further restriction does > not survive such relicensing or conveying." > > And since it requires relicensing to remain gplv3... > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Chris DiBona <[email protected]> wrote: >> If you read 5, it says that in reference to 7, which says: >> >> And again, from 7: : "When you convey a copy of a covered work, you >> may at your option >> remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of >> it." >> >> Again: section 7 is a pain. >> >> And before you go all section 8 on me, which says: >> >> But: 8 You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly >> provided under this License. >> >> Remember that section 7, which again, reads: >> >> "When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option >> remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of >> it." >> >> Is provided under the license. >> >> We can go back and forth all day on this, and I'm going to be able to >> remove any additional terms from your work as I am allowed to do so by >> section 7. That said, I don't think this matters , and you are welcome >> to use google code and I hope you like it. >> >> I think section 7 and the additional terms language is deeply flawed >> and makes compliance needlessly confusing. >> >> Chris >> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:15 PM, LWC <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Again, additional PERMISSIONS and additional RESTRICTIONS are two >>> different things. >>> >>> GPLv3 allows both. But while re-distributed copies can drop additional >>> permissions, they *must* honor additional restrictions (if they fall >>> within the closed list). >>> >>> License screenshot #1 >>> http://img239.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=45976_additionalterms1_122_485lo.jpg >>> >>> License screenshot #2 >>> http://img249.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=45977_additionalterms2_122_143lo.jpg >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc. >> Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at >> http://code.google.com >> Personal Site and Weblog: http://dibona.com >> > > > > -- > Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc. > Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at > http://code.google.com > Personal Site and Weblog: http://dibona.com > -- Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc. Google's Open Source and Developer programs can be found at http://code.google.com Personal Site and Weblog: http://dibona.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.
