True, but those don't go that far back and for the "source changes" section only enumerates updates for the branch last updated. So if two branches were updated in the same day, you'll only know one got changed. Better than nothing, but not effecient or reliable.
This is so dumb. We've been completely abondoned and its obviously nothing has been done to address this. They've just decided to not do a thing and know that people will just adapt to a very ineffective tracking system. Starring something means nothing to them. They do not care about feedback from their users and that's quite apparant in their other services. They do what they think and we can take it or leave it (like this). I've seen full games built/released in the time span since this has been removed. It's a simple update page!!!!! Copying strings and creating links and putting it all in the form of a list is about as simple as things get. What the hell is going on with this??? Face it, they're not touching this service again unless it's to rip things out. I'm quite sure they're eyeing the atom feeds now since you brought them up. They probably didn't know they were even there and now that they do, will deem them a stabilty risk and promptly gut the code. Why leave something in that's useful if there's some edge case that may cause a problem (therotically of course). Almost 3 months and almost 1000 people have spoke up and what's been done? Nothing. What's been communicated? Nothing. What's been gained? Stability? No. Unbelieveable. On May 16, 8:58 am, [email protected] wrote: > Since there hasn't been a reply yet, I've found the atom feeds > onhttp://code.google.com/p/{project-name}/feeds to be useful. That is, the > Issue Updates and Source Changes Atom feed combined look a bit like the old > Updates page - except they are two seperate feeds. Actually, the main > reason I was frequenting the Updates page was to see what happened, who > committed what, in order to do code reviews and stuff - updates to issues > were more like a secondary gain while looking at the SCM activity. > > And here's the puzzling part: Are the Atom feeds "as fragile" as the > Updates page? If yes, why are they still online? If no, why is the updates > page not just a mashup of the two, sorted by date? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Hosting on Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en.
