i m unable to login to link given by u : http://codejam-publictest.appspot.com/codejam/contest/35001/dashboard
how do i login to this : i dont have LDAP username and password . On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:42 AM, jbernadas <[email protected]> wrote: > A new version of the commandline has been pushed into the repository: > http://code.google.com/p/codejam-commandline/downloads/list. This new > version (1.1-beta1) supports arbitrary I/O sets, which should fix the > issues observed during the qualification round. > > If you want to test the new version before tomorrow you can do it at > http://codejam-publictest.appspot.com/codejam/contest/35001/dashboard, > which have the qualification round problems with the twist that problem B > has two small inputs and one large input. Be aware that the inputs have > just a few cases as this is just to test the new commandline tool. > > The previous version (1.0-beta4) will be deprecated after tomorrow's > round. Remember that the previous version only works if all the problems > only have small/large inputs. If you find any issues with the new version > feel free to open an issue in the project (for some reason I wasn't getting > emails about new issues, but I'm going to fix that). > > Good Luck in Round 3! > > > > On Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:13:20 PM UTC-7, jbernadas wrote: >> >> Sorry for that, my child was born two months ago so I'm not working on >> the problems this year. Also, I was on parental leave and missed this >> thread. Anyway, my fault. >> >> *tl;dr: I'm working on a fix to allow the commandline tool to accept >> problems with any kind of I/O sets. I think it will be ready for Round 3. >> * >> >> Half of the fix is done which is exposing the required data in the >> server. The other half, updating the commandline tool to use this new >> information, is complete but it requires some extra testing. >> >> The issue was that it assumed that all problems have exactly one small >> and one large I/O set when parsing the user status and submissions. Did you >> try using the -f flag? That flag skips the checks that use that information >> and tries to submit directly. >> >> The new version will not make any kind of assumptions about the I/O sets, >> so it should be more robust. The only assumption it will make is that the >> only kind of inputs are small and large, which I hope will be more >> persistent. >> >> >> On Saturday, April 14, 2012 9:25:51 PM UTC-7, Vexorian wrote: >>> >>> I had a couple of issues with the tool during the qualification. >>> Wondering if it was just me or if anyone else experienced them. >>> >>> I was surprised it did not have any issue downloading and submitting >>> problem A, as it has a different format and all that. >>> >>> When I tried to solve B, I was able to download B-small and B-large, but >>> it would not let me upload. It said that I did not download the test case >>> before uploading, so I had to submit manually. The same happened with C. I >>> did not even try with D-small. >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Code Jam" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/RVrSVM5qeQkJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
