A new version of the commandline has been pushed into the repository: http://code.google.com/p/codejam-commandline/downloads/list. This new version (1.1-beta1) supports arbitrary I/O sets, which should fix the issues observed during the qualification round.
If you want to test the new version before tomorrow you can do it at http://codejam-publictest.appspot.com/codejam/contest/35001/dashboard, which have the qualification round problems with the twist that problem B has two small inputs and one large input. Be aware that the inputs have just a few cases as this is just to test the new commandline tool. The previous version (1.0-beta4) will be deprecated after tomorrow's round. Remember that the previous version only works if all the problems only have small/large inputs. If you find any issues with the new version feel free to open an issue in the project (for some reason I wasn't getting emails about new issues, but I'm going to fix that). Good Luck in Round 3! On Thursday, May 31, 2012 7:13:20 PM UTC-7, jbernadas wrote: > > Sorry for that, my child was born two months ago so I'm not working on the > problems this year. Also, I was on parental leave and missed this thread. > Anyway, my fault. > > *tl;dr: I'm working on a fix to allow the commandline tool to accept > problems with any kind of I/O sets. I think it will be ready for Round 3.* > > Half of the fix is done which is exposing the required data in the server. > The other half, updating the commandline tool to use this new information, > is complete but it requires some extra testing. > > The issue was that it assumed that all problems have exactly one small and > one large I/O set when parsing the user status and submissions. Did you try > using the -f flag? That flag skips the checks that use that information and > tries to submit directly. > > The new version will not make any kind of assumptions about the I/O sets, > so it should be more robust. The only assumption it will make is that the > only kind of inputs are small and large, which I hope will be more > persistent. > > > On Saturday, April 14, 2012 9:25:51 PM UTC-7, Vexorian wrote: >> >> I had a couple of issues with the tool during the qualification. >> Wondering if it was just me or if anyone else experienced them. >> >> I was surprised it did not have any issue downloading and submitting >> problem A, as it has a different format and all that. >> >> When I tried to solve B, I was able to download B-small and B-large, but >> it would not let me upload. It said that I did not download the test case >> before uploading, so I had to submit manually. The same happened with C. I >> did not even try with D-small. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Code Jam" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-code/-/RVrSVM5qeQkJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en.
