Well, Patricia said these show up in the feed but not the Docs UI. You're saying they show up in neither. I'm a little confused that there's different behavior across the board.
Eric On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Daniel Marashlian <daniel...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Wait... I'm confused :) > > So I try to add a user's email to a document, at least when I use the > batch processing, it reports back a success but when I do a GET on > "http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/[docType]%3A[docID]"; > and check through the XML for the gAcl:scope that user's Email is not > in the list. > > How is that consistently working? > > maybe I'm confused on the separation between the ACL and Google Docs. > > On Jun 23, 1:27 pm, Eric Bidelman <api.e...@google.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the quick info folks. > > It sounds like the adding ACLs through the API consistently works > > (e.g. the correct results show up when querying the ACL feed), > > but they're not propagated to Google Docs. Can one of you open > > a bug for this with the detailed info in this thread. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Eric > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Daniel Marashlian <daniel...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > The "single" feed seems to be working more consistently, but when it > > > fails it doesn't tell me anything in the response. > > > > > this is the XML I'm using (maybe I'm doing it wrong): > > > > > POST'ing it to: " > http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz" > > > > > XML: > > > "<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'xmlns:gAcl='http:// > > > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > > > <category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind'term='http:// > > > schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > > > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > > > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='tmal...@pelotonics.com'/> > > > </entry>" > > > > > Here is a response from a call that failed: > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/ > > > 2005/Atom' xmlns:gAcl='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007' > > > xmlns:batch='http://schemas.google.com/gdata/batch'><id>http:// > > > docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz/ > > > user%3Atmalone%40pelotonics.com > </id><updated>2009-06-23T19:56:20.103Z</ > > > updated><category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > > > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/><title > > > type='text'>Document Permission - tmal...@pelotonics.com</title><link > > > rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz/user%3Atmalone > > > %40pelotonics.com'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' > > > href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz/user%3Atmalone%40pelotonics.com'/><gAcl:role > > > value='writer'/><gAcl:scope type='user' value='tmal...@pelotonics.com > '/ > > > ></entry> > > > > > On Jun 23, 11:07 am, "Patricia Goldweic" <pgoldw...@northwestern.edu> > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > The response to your question: 'Just so I'm clear, these ACLs never > show > > > up, > > > > correct?' is YES. Those entries DO NOT show up in the GUI (even after > a > > > > delay), but they're definitely in the feed. > > > > > > I'm not sure who you asking the second question to: 'also, does the > user > > > > show up when re-querying the doc's ACL feed? (in my case, I can see > the > > > ACL > > > > entries through the api if I re-query). > > > > > > -Patricia > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > From: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > [mailto:google-docs-data-a...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric > > > Bidelman > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:45 PM > > > > To: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > Subject: [Google-Docs-Data-APIs] Re: The response from modifying the > ACL > > > is > > > > returning false-positives > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Please report bugs if you think they are. I triage the issue tracker > > > > on a regular basis. It's also helpful to post in the forum (as > you've > > > done > > > > :)) > > > > so others can follow any issues. > > > > > > Sometimes there are small delays between doing something in the API > and > > > > when it actually shows up in a re-query or the Docs UI. Just so I'm > > > clear, > > > > these ACLs never show up, correct? > > > > > > Daniel, do you see the same happening when NOT using a batch feed? > > > > Inserting a entry and inserting a single entry inside of a batch feed > > > > go through different pipelines. > > > > > > Also, does the user show up when re-querying the doc's ACL feed? > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Patricia Goldweic > > > > > > <pgoldw...@northwestern.edu> wrote: > > > > > > I've also noticed problems with using the apis to modify/add acl > entries. > > > In > > > > my case, some entries get added, but then, they DO NOT display on the > GUI > > > > (as if the document was not being shared with those people, even > though > > > the > > > > acl entries are actually there, and sharing actually works). This > only > > > > happens once in a while (not every time). We should probably start > > > reporting > > > > these issues as bugs, right? > > > > -Patricia > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > > [mailto:google-docs-data-a...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > > > > > Daniel Marashlian > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:15 AM > > > > > To: Google Docs Data APIs > > > > > Subject: [Google-Docs-Data-APIs] The response from modifying > > > > > the ACL is returning false-positives > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > I've been doing some final testing on the Pelotonics > > > > > integration, and I've noticed the Google Docs API is > > > > > returning false-positives on modifying the ACL. > > > > > > > I added a document, then tried to insert 5 collaborators on > > > > > that document. I only have 1 transaction in each call (I went > > > > > away from batch processing). The API returns a result of what > > > > > happened. In this case, 4/5 collaborators got added to the > > > > > document, which would be fine if the API actually told me > > > > > that one of them failed. > > > > > > > Here is a response on a successful call: > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><atom:feed > > > > > xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' > > > > > xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/ > > > > > opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:gAcl='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007 > ' > > > > > xmlns:batch='http://schemas.google.com/gdata/batch > '><atom:id>http:// > > > > > docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28j > > > > > n7xhfgd</ > > > > > atom:id><atom:updated>2009-06-23T05:03:41.421Z</ > > > > > atom:updated><atom:title type='text'>Batch > > > > > Feed</atom:title><atom:link > > > > > rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed'type='application/atom > > > > > +xml' href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd'/><atom:link > > > > > rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#batch' > > > > > type='application/atom+xml' href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/batch'/ > > > > > ><atom:entry><atom:id> > http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/ > > > > > document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adaniel%40pelotonics.com</ > > > > > atom:id><atom:updated>2009-06-23T05:03:41.420Z</ > > > > > atom:updated><atom:category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/ > > > > > 2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/ > > > > > ><atom:title type='text'>Document Permission - > dan...@pelotonics.com</ > > > > > atom:title><atom:link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adaniel%40pelotonics.com'/><atom:link > > > > > rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adaniel > > > > > %40pelotonics.com'/><gAcl:role value='writer'/><gAcl:scope > type='user' > > > > > value='dan...@pelotonics.com'/><batch:id>1</batch:id><batch:status > > > > > code='201' reason='Created'/><batch:operation > > > > > type='insert'/></ atom:entry></atom:feed> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > Here is the response on the failed call (I know it failed > > > > > cause the email is not a collaborator on the document): > > > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><atom:feed > > > > > xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' > > > > > xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/ > > > > > opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:gAcl='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007 > ' > > > > > xmlns:batch='http://schemas.google.com/gdata/batch > '><atom:id>http:// > > > > > docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28j > > > > > n7xhfgd</ > > > > > atom:id><atom:updated>2009-06-23T05:03:43.593Z</ > > > > > atom:updated><atom:title type='text'>Batch > > > > > Feed</atom:title><atom:link > > > > > rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed'type='application/atom > > > > > +xml' href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd'/><atom:link > > > > > rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#batch' > > > > > type='application/atom+xml' href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/batch'/ > > > > > ><atom:entry><atom:id> > http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/ > > > > > document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adanielzev%40yahoo.com</ > > > > > atom:id><atom:updated>2009-06-23T05:03:43.593Z</ > > > > > atom:updated><atom:category scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/ > > > > > 2005#kind' term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/ > > > > > ><atom:title type='text'>Document Permission - daniel...@yahoo.com > </ > > > > > atom:title><atom:link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adanielzev%40yahoo.com'/><atom:link > > > > > rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_28jn7xhfgd/user%3Adanielzev > > > > > %40yahoo.com'/><gAcl:role value='writer'/><gAcl:scope type='user' > > > > > value='daniel...@yahoo.com'/><batch:id>1</batch:id><batch:status > > > > > code='201' reason='Created'/><batch:operation > > > > > type='insert'/></ atom:entry></atom:feed> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > As you can see both returned back code='201' reason='Created' > > > > > > > Am I doing something wrong here? If it fails, it fails... and > > > > > I'll re- process it... But if the API tells me it worked, > > > > > then I should believe it. No? > > > > > > > I guess what I could do it double verify... Pull all of the > > > > > collaborators on the document and double check that person > > > > > got added in. For the time being, I think that's what I'm > > > > > going to do right now. > > > > > But I would > > > > ... > > > > read more ยป > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Docs Data APIs" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-docs-data-apis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Docs-Data-APIs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
