Well, you should only be adding ACLs that correspond to gDocs users. A combination of anything else may appear to work, but I wouldn't trust it.
Eric On Jun 24, 10:02 am, Daniel Marashlian <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote: > please go ahead :) > > I haven't done too much testing after the fact. I'm going to do some > testing on that scenario you just described. > > On Jun 24, 7:33 am, "Patricia Goldweic" <pgoldw...@northwestern.edu> > wrote: > > > > > I've seen this behavior too. In fact, I concluded that, if you add (through > > the api) an acl entry for a (not yet)existent account, you get no errors at > > the time you are doing this. However, if the account gets later created, > > those acls which should have been placed in the feed in the previous step, > > are really not working. This is consistent with the behavior you just > > described David, mainly the fact that non-existent account acls ACTUALLY DO > > FAIL when they are added (and therefore are not really being added), but > > this is not being reported by Google. > > I think this definitely deserves a bug report. Are you going to file this > > one David, or should I do it? > > > Patricia Goldweic > > pgoldw...@northwestern.edu > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > [mailto:google-docs-data-a...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > > > Daniel Marashlian > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:42 PM > > > To: Google Docs Data APIs > > > Subject: [Google-Docs-Data-APIs] Re: The response from > > > modifying the ACL is returning false-positives > > > > to make it even more confusing, I've been testing "bad > > > emails" like kjhasdf...@pelotonics.com and they show up on > > > the UI but not in the ACL list... hmmm. > > > > Fun times :) > > > > On Jun 23, 3:31 pm, Eric Bidelman <api.e...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Well, Patricia said these show up in the feed but not the Docs UI. > > > > You're saying they show up in neither. I'm a little confused that > > > > there's different behavior across the board. > > > > > Eric > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Daniel Marashlian > > > <daniel...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > Wait... I'm confused :) > > > > > > So I try to add a user's email to a document, at least when I use > > > > > the batch processing, it reports back a success but when > > > I do a GET > > > > > on > > > "http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/[docType]%3A[docID]"; > > > > > and check through the XML for the gAcl:scope that user's Email is > > > > > not in the list. > > > > > > How is that consistently working? > > > > > > maybe I'm confused on the separation between the ACL and > > > Google Docs. > > > > > > On Jun 23, 1:27 pm, Eric Bidelman <api.e...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the quick info folks. > > > > > > It sounds like the adding ACLs through the API > > > consistently works > > > > > > (e.g. the correct results show up when querying the ACL > > > feed), but > > > > > > they're not propagated to Google Docs. Can one of you > > > open a bug > > > > > > for this with the detailed info in this thread. > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Daniel Marashlian > > > > > ><daniel...@gmail.com > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > The "single" feed seems to be working more consistently, but > > > > > > > when it fails it doesn't tell me anything in the response. > > > > > > > > this is the XML I'm using (maybe I'm doing it wrong): > > > > > > > > POST'ing it to: " > > > > >http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz" > > > > > > > > XML: > > > > > > > "<entry xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'xmlns:gAcl='http:// > > > > > > > schemas.google.com/acl/2007'> > > > > > > > <category > > > > > > > scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind'term='http:// > > > > > > > schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/> > > > > > > > <gAcl:role value='writer'/> > > > > > > > <gAcl:scope type='user' value='tmal...@pelotonics.com'/> > > > > > > > </entry>" > > > > > > > > Here is a response from a call that failed: > > > > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><entry > > > > > > > xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' > > > xmlns:gAcl='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007' > > > > xmlns:batch='http://schemas.google.com/gdata/batch'><id>http:// > > > > docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_51fjc > > > > > > > scsvz/ > > > > > > > user%3Atmalone%40pelotonics.com > > > > > </id><updated>2009-06-23T19:56:20.103Z</ > > > > > > > updated><category > > > scheme='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#kind' > > > > > > > term='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007#accessRule'/><title > > > > > > > type='text'>Document Permission - > > > > > > > tmal...@pelotonics.com</title><link > > > > > > > rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/ > > > > feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz/user%3Atma > > > > > > > lone %40pelotonics.com'/><link rel='edit' > > > > > > > type='application/atom+xml' > > > > > > > href='http://docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document > > > > %3Adg7wvvh9_51fjcscsvz/user%3Atmalone%40pelotonics.com'/><gAcl:r > > > > > > > ole value='writer'/><gAcl:scope type='user' > > > > > > > value='tmal...@pelotonics.com > > > > > '/ > > > > > > > ></entry> > > > > > > > > On Jun 23, 11:07 am, "Patricia Goldweic" > > > > > > > <pgoldw...@northwestern.edu> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > The response to your question: 'Just so I'm clear, > > > these ACLs > > > > > > > > never > > > > > show > > > > > > > up, > > > > > > > > correct?' is YES. Those entries DO NOT show up in the GUI > > > > > > > > (even after > > > > > a > > > > > > > > delay), but they're definitely in the feed. > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure who you asking the second question to: 'also, > > > > > > > > does the > > > > > user > > > > > > > > show up when re-querying the doc's ACL feed? (in > > > my case, I > > > > > > > > can see > > > > > the > > > > > > > ACL > > > > > > > > entries through the api if I re-query). > > > > > > > > > -Patricia > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > From: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > > [mailto:google-docs-data-a...@googlegroups.com] On > > > Behalf Of > > > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > Bidelman > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:45 PM > > > > > > > > To: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > > Subject: [Google-Docs-Data-APIs] Re: The response from > > > > > > > > modifying the > > > > > ACL > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > returning false-positives > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > Please report bugs if you think they are. I triage > > > the issue > > > > > > > > tracker on a regular basis. It's also helpful to > > > post in the > > > > > > > > forum (as > > > > > you've > > > > > > > done > > > > > > > > :)) > > > > > > > > so others can follow any issues. > > > > > > > > > Sometimes there are small delays between doing something in > > > > > > > > the API > > > > > and > > > > > > > > when it actually shows up in a re-query or the Docs > > > UI. Just > > > > > > > > so I'm > > > > > > > clear, > > > > > > > > these ACLs never show up, correct? > > > > > > > > > Daniel, do you see the same happening when NOT > > > using a batch feed? > > > > > > > > Inserting a entry and inserting a single entry inside of a > > > > > > > > batch feed go through different pipelines. > > > > > > > > > Also, does the user show up when re-querying the > > > doc's ACL feed? > > > > > > > > > Eric > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Patricia Goldweic > > > > > > > > > <pgoldw...@northwestern.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I've also noticed problems with using the apis to > > > modify/add > > > > > > > > acl > > > > > entries. > > > > > > > In > > > > > > > > my case, some entries get added, but then, they DO > > > NOT display > > > > > > > > on the > > > > > GUI > > > > > > > > (as if the document was not being shared with those people, > > > > > > > > even > > > > > though > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > acl entries are actually there, and sharing > > > actually works). > > > > > > > > This > > > > > only > > > > > > > > happens once in a while (not every time). We should > > > probably > > > > > > > > start > > > > > > > reporting > > > > > > > > these issues as bugs, right? > > > > > > > > -Patricia > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > From: Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com > > > > > > > > > [mailto:google-docs-data-a...@googlegroups.com] > > > On Behalf Of > > > > > > > > > Daniel Marashlian > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:15 AM > > > > > > > > > To: Google Docs Data APIs > > > > > > > > > Subject: [Google-Docs-Data-APIs] The response > > > from modifying > > > > > > > > > the ACL is returning false-positives > > > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > > > I've been doing some final testing on the Pelotonics > > > > > > > > > integration, and I've noticed the Google Docs API is > > > > > > > > > returning false-positives on modifying the ACL. > > > > > > > > > > I added a document, then tried to insert 5 > > > collaborators on > > > > > > > > > that document. I only have 1 transaction in each call (I > > > > > > > > > went away from batch processing). The API returns > > > a result > > > > > > > > > of what happened. In this case, 4/5 collaborators > > > got added > > > > > > > > > to the document, which would be fine if the API actually > > > > > > > > > told me that one of them failed. > > > > > > > > > > Here is a response on a successful call: > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><atom:feed > > > > > > > > > xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' > > > > > > > > > xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/ > > > > > > > > > opensearchrss/1.0/' > > > > > > > > > xmlns:gAcl='http://schemas.google.com/acl/2007 > > > > > ' > > > > > > > > > xmlns:batch='http://schemas.google.com/gdata/batch > > > > > '><atom:id>http:// > > > > docs.google.com/feeds/acl/private/full/document%3Adg7wvvh9_2 > > > > > > > > > 8j > > > > > > > > > n7xhfgd</ > > > > > > > > > atom:id><atom:updated>2009-06-23T05:03:41.421Z</... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Docs Data APIs" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Docs-Data-APIs@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-docs-data-apis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Docs-Data-APIs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
