Hi, At this point, there isn't a major distinction between gadgets using the legacy API and gadgets using gadgets.*. The legacy API, as it's now implemented, is just a wrapper around the gadgets.* API. All gadgets have access to gadgets.*, and functionality such as the content-rewriter.
Dan On Jul 4, 12:28 am, SOMW <[email protected]> wrote: > This issue is being tracked for the Legacy API > here:http://code.google.com/p/igoogle-legacy/issues/detail?id=562 > > Unfortunately, to my knowledge, the disabling of content rewriting > that Dan suggests in the message below is unavailable to gadget > authors who are still using the Legacy > API.http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API/msg/a74b582e0b6feff1 > > I have attempted the work around above detailed above in this thread > by String, as well as the one he proposes in the thread below, neither > resolve the > issue.http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API/browse_thread/threa... > > I have noticed however that reloading a page with an affected gadget > will cause the new load of the gadget to adjust the height properly. > > On Jun 30, 1:45 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Dan. It's still not clear to me (as well as, I'm sure, many > > others) exactly what has changed and when it changed. We've seen > > gadgets breaking to various degrees and on various platforms, and I > > was hoping you could clarify what is happening and what the long-term > > plan might be. > > > 1. Gadgets in syndication began to behave differently around the first > > week of June. Can you tell us exactly what was changed? Does the > > Gadgets API still support the same browsers and functions (e.g., > > _IG_AdjustIFrameHeight) as before? > > 2. I'm seeing new behavior in iGoogle in Safari and Chrome on OS X. > > Has the way gadgets are delivered in iGoogle changed within the last > > month? If so, has this been served to ALL iGoogle users or just some > > of them? > > > Thanks for clearing this up. Once we understand what's happening, > > hopefully we can begin to address issues in our gadgets that have > > emerged, or issues that already existed but have been exposed by the > > recent changes. > > > E > > > On Jun 26, 4:43 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > We have a couple fixes going out soon to correct behavior of gadgets > > > in open syndication, and fixes foradjustheightare among them. > > > Please update this thread if you notice the issues disappear. > > > Likewise, I'll attempt to get notice when the fixes go out and when > > > the behavior should be corrected. > > > > Thanks, > > > Dan > > > > On Jun 25, 9:13 pm, tmyymmt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > Please see this site.http://tmyymmt.mine.nu/gg/ > > > > > I think same problem about "gadgets.window.adjustHeight" or > > > > _IG_AdjustIFrameHeight. > > > > There are 5 gadgets on the page. Theheightis wrong when I use > > > > Firefox. > > > > The method set sameheightto these gadgets. > > > > It isn't working when there are not less than 2 gadgets on same page. > > > > It was working when before changing iGoogle API. > > > > > And the width is wrong too when I use IE. > > > > > On 6ζ26ζ₯, εεΎ12:36, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The behavior actually breaks differently depending on the browser. In > > > > > Safari 4, no matter which instance of the gadget calls > > > > > _IG_AdjustIFrameHeight, it adjusts the first gadget on the page. In > > > > > Firefox 3.5 RC3, it adjusts all instances of the gadget. > > > > > >http://kalafarski.com/directions/double/ > > > > > > On Jun 25, 10:48 pm, String <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 24, 1:41 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think I just answered my own question: the two instances of the > > > > > > > gadget remain linked. IF and only if both instances of the gadget > > > > > > > load with the "new" domain. > > > > > > > That is interesting; the gadgets are in separate iframes, so they > > > > > > should have separate instances of window. That almost sounds like a > > > > > > browser bug to me; what browser are you using? Does this happen in > > > > > > others? > > > > > > > String --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
