Hi Ty, The gadgets should we working, I'm still searching for an answer as to why they do not.
Thanks, Dan On Oct 12, 2:30 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Just checking to see if you had any updates on these issues (legacy > renderer for syndication and toolbars). > > Thanks > > On Oct 2, 1:49 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Ty, > > > I'm looking both for an answer, or alternatively, someone else who > > might have an answer, so I will have to report back. If I haven't > > updated in a few days, please feel free to bump this thread. > > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > On Oct 2, 10:44 am, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Dan. > > > > Regarding the toolbar issue, should we wait for you to come back with > > > an update or is there another contact that we should sync with to > > > follow it up. If the gadget is OK and the bug is on the container/ > > > renderer, this means that soon we will have many toolbar buttons go > > > blank as developers continue to migrate to gadgets.* > > > > On Oct 1, 9:18 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > On Oct 1, 7:49 am, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. I see the embed option works fine when you > > > > > change "ig" to "gadgets"; however, this is not a change that we can > > > > > make: Users access the "http:// > > > > > p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/ig/creat..." > > > > > creator page when they click on the "Embed this gadget" link on the > > > > > lower right corner of the gadget details page in the iGoogle Directory > > > > > (http://bit.ly/Bd2Oiinthiscase). So by default, Google is > > > > > dispensing the code with "http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=";. If > > > > > this is a bug on the creator page, are you planning to update these > > > > > links there? > > > > > Yes, I have filed a bug internally to fix this. > > > > > > In any case, changing the url may not be the best option since we have > > > > > many users already embedded the "http://www.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url="; > > > > > codes in their web pages. They won't know to replace "ig" with > > > > > "gadgets" in their code.. so it would be ideal if we could get the > > > > > existing "ig" link to work. Any chance of fixing that bug? > > > > > I will request that this is changed as well. > > > > > > Also, equally important, the migrated gadgets.* do not work on Google > > > > > Toolar as a gadget button. For example, please try adding one of the > > > > > Toolbar buttons athttp://bit.ly/2GEv0, you will notice that they > > > > > appear blank as they do on the syndication page. They used to work > > > > > (i.e. display the gadget contents) just fine when written in legacy > > > > > _IG. > > > > > I'm not on the Toolbar team, so I don't have an answer for this one, > > > > but I'll ask around. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > On Sep 30, 7:15 pm, "Dan (Google)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Ty, > > > > > > > It appears that this is a bug on the creator page, and not a bug in > > > > > > the gadget. The iframe URL the creator page generates is creating a > > > > > > reference > > > > > > tohttp://p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/ig/ifr?url=...... > > > > > > which is the legacy renderer that doesn't support gadgets.*. > > > > > > However, > > > > > > if you change the path > > > > > > tohttp://p8f4e7ltqfl2k83ak14j9sopdhb170qa.open.gmodules.com/gadgets/ifr...... > > > > > > then the gadget works fine. Since this will affect the JS you embed > > > > > > in > > > > > > your page, you should modify all references to *.gmodules.com/ig/ifr > > > > > > to instead read *.gmodules.com/gadgets/ifr. > > > > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > On Sep 16, 6:10 am, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > Just checking to see if you got a chance to look into this. Thank > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > > > On Sep 14, 1:05 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > > You asked about example pages where the three gadgets that I > > > > > > > > listed > > > > > > > > above are embedded. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. > > > > > > > > > Googel's "Add this gadget to your webpage" preview screen would > > > > > > > > be a > > > > > > > > good place to start. For example, please take a look at the > > > > > > > > following > > > > > > > > link > > > > > > > > >http://bit.ly/cP2KP > > > > > > > > > ... where the preview window appears empty with a > > > > > > > > "'gadgets.util' is > > > > > > > > null or not an object" javascript error > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, please let me know > > > > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 6:42 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dan, I'm encountering another similar problem, this time only > > > > > > > > > in IE. > > > > > > > > > I've worked around the Analytics problem by using the old > > > > > > > > > _IG_Analytics library until that problem is fixed, but in > > > > > > > > > syndication, > > > > > > > > > IE8's error message tells me that "gadgets" is not defined. > > > > > > > > > As a > > > > > > > > > result, the gadget breaks on load. > > > > > > > > > > As before, my gadget spec can be found > > > > > > > > > at:http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/114281111391296844949/dri... > > > > > > > > > and a sample syndicated instance of the gadget is > > > > > > > > > at:http://kalafarski.com/directions/dev/ > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 10, 7:57 am, XU SHU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if google did something or not, but now it is > > > > > > > > > > fixed > > > > > > > > > > automatically. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks very much for your help!! > > > > > > > > > > > With best regards > > > > > > > > > > Shu > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dan (Google) > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ty, > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have an example page where these are embedded? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 8, 11:23 pm, ty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have a similar issue with our gadgets newly migrated > > > > > > > > > > > > to gadgets.* > > > > > > > > > > > > > All works OK on iGoogle; however the gadgets appear > > > > > > > > > > > > blank on > > > > > > > > > > > > syndication including Google Toolbar Buttons. In > > > > > > > > > > > > particular, we're > > > > > > > > > > > > getting the following javascript error: > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'gadgets.util' is null or not an object > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll give you three live xmls... all with the same > > > > > > > > > > > > problem, throwing > > > > > > > > > > > > js error and blank screens on syndication: > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://bit.ly/8S67Rhttp://bit.ly/e7EJXhttp://bit.ly/Hxydg > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ty > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 1, 4:45 pm, skeeJay <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Dan. I appreciate you looking into it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward to > > > > > > > > > > > > > hearing back from you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 31, 7:58 pm, "Dan (Google)" > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To avoid keeping you waiting too long: I'm able to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reproduce your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue, and it would appear that there is some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incompatibility between > > > > > > > > > > > > > > opensyndicationand Analytics. I'm working with the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Analytics team to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > try and figure out the best workaround, and will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > report back when I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have more details. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 5:47 pm, skeeJay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan. I've had good success migrating the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gadget except for one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue: attempting to adopt the Analytics API for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gadget tracking > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://code.google.com/apis/analytics/docs/tracking/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gadgetTracking.html). It works well when my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gadget is on iGoogle, > > > > > > > > > > > so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's very possible the problem is on my end. An > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > error only occurs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when the gadget is insyndication, despite the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fact the Analytics > > > > > > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lists OpenSyndicationas one of its supported > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > containers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The error I get in my Firefox Error Console is a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simple: "_IG_GA is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not defined." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My gadget spec can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > >http://hosting.gmodules.com/ig/gadgets/file/114281111391296844949/dri... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and a sample syndicated instance of the gadget is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at: > > > > > > > > > > >http://kalafarski.com/directions/dev/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 17, 10:30 am, skeeJay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Dan. Will do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 10, 7:17 pm, "Dan (Google)" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yesgadgets insyndicationalso > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supportgadgets.*. Pleaselet me > > > > > > > > > > > know > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if you encounter any problems during the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > migration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 7, 6:34 am, skeeJay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given that we've learned the legacy API > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will be deprecated > > > > > > > > > > > eventually, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've begun exploring migrating our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > existinggadgets > > > > > > > > > > > togadgets.*.> > > > > However, thegadgets.* > > > > > > > > > > > developer'sguide does NOT > > > > > > > > > > > mentionsyndication > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a supported container forgadgets.* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gadgets. Issyndication > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supported by gadgets.*?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "iGoogle Developer Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Gadgets-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
